News, Village Life

Sidewalk Protection Ordinance Heads to Final Vote


As construction advances on the five-story mixed-use Ziggurat development, the sidewalk along Grand Avenue remains open, but construction fencing has closed the sidewalk and adjacent parking lane along Matilda Street. (David Villano for the Spotlight)
A proposal up for review Thursday by the City Commission would, in some instances, require developers to provide safe passageway along sidewalks during construction. (Don Finefrock for the Spotlight)

3 Comments

  1. Michael Langlois

    anyone who’s spent more than 5 minutes in new york city will recognize this issue. every construction site in the city builds covered sidewalk access. rarely, if ever, is a sidewalk inaccessible because they are essential for pedestrians. in miami, of course, pedestrians are cannon fodder for vehicles and developers so go figure.

  2. CHRISTOPHER LUNDING

    Paris Wallace is correct. This change, although very welcome indeed, will be meaningless unless the City bureaucracy actually enforces the requirement for keeping sidewalks open during construction, using sheds as many, many other cities do. And the last minute addition of an exception where a shed is said to be “impractical” may allow a developer-hired “expert” to opine that a shed would “cost too much” and escape the requirement.

    A far better approach would have been to limit exceptions to circumstances where a shed over a sidewalk would create a “dangerous or hazardous condition that endangers life or property”, copying the exception from the City’s noise ordinance. That is a much more objective, fact based standard. But of course when limiting language is added at the last minute, public input becomes impossible. That practice by the City Commission has to stop.

  3. The limited language was not added at the last minute. Rather, it was added as a modification at the July 9, 2026 City Commission meeting and the First Reading passed the City Commission by a unanimous vote on that date. This is unlike the T5 substituted language issue where the language was added within the 10-day advance public notice period required by the Florida Statutes. In this case, there is no violation of the 10-day advance public notice requirement and there will be a 2-week period to for public input. However, the modification makes the provision ineffective, since the general contractor and licensed architect or licensed engineer will be hired and paid for by the developer. It is a pretty toothless Ordinance that no doubt will unanimously pass the City Commission. Don’t expect any sheds to be built on the sidewalks of construction sites in Coconut Grove…that’s not going to happen.

Leave a comment

Sponsors + Advertisement

Recent News