News, Village Life

For Sheila Dixon, the Streets of West Grove Are Home


Shaunterria Chambers (left) and Katherine Martinez (right) of the City of Miami Department of Human Services visit Sheila Dixon last April. Over the years, Dixon has repeatedly declined offers of shelter and other assistance, saying she “chooses to be here” on the streets of Coconut Grove. (Patrick Farrell for the Spotlight)

Mayor Eileen Higgins, who could have vetoed the ordinance, signed it into law July 24, one day after the commission approved

D’Cota Dixon — one of five children of West Grove resident Sheila Dixon — accepts the Jason Witten Collegiate Man of the Year Award in 2018, honoring the University of Wisconsin defensive back for his leadership, courage and character on and off the football field. Dixon later spent part of two seasons with the NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers before embarking on a career as a Christian evangelist. (Courtesy of the Jason Witten SCORE Foundation)
Early on a recent Saturday afternoon, just days before a new law targeting Miami’s homeless population was set to take effect, Sheila Dixon’s belongings sat neatly stacked along the north side of Grand Avenue in the West Grove. (Don Finefrock for the Spotlight)

5 Comments

  1. For years, I have been in contact with homeless people and many of them are not dangerous for the community. They don’t deserve to be arrested. They have a dignity and deserves compassion and understanding of their fragility. Otherwise, mental health issues, veteran’s traumas, drug addiction, are circumstances that unable them to have a home. Arresting them will have nefarious consequences in their difficult life. Please, politician, reconsider this!

  2. A great story, both uplifting and tragic. For years I have observed this woman on the sidewalk and have wondered about her. Now I know. And it’s nice to see Damian Pardo opposing the measure to prohibit such activity. None of us want to see someone living on the street, but if she is happy out there, why not?

  3. What a heartbreaking story. As much as I don’t think arresting homeless people will solve anything, neither will leaving them on the street to suffer. This is certainly an outlier but the entire situation can not, honestly, be painted with the same brush. Nobody wants the Grove to turn into a homeless encampment and open air drug market like LA, SF, and other cities have allowed with overly permissive laws that might feel compassionate but are ultimately enabling a horrible existence. A jail is certainly not the answer but abandonment is just as cruel.

  4. I thought about not posting this out of respect for Ms. Dixon’s remaining privacy. Instead I shared with a friend for advice who reminded me that drugs, both good and bad, have changed society. It’s not about me, or even Ms. Dixon. It’s about us. So here goes:

    I used to stop and talk with Ms. Dixon when she was on her meds and not agitated. Highly intelligent and articulate woman. Always clean so obviously some family member was looking after her. She has extensive oral history of the Grove going back quite a way, and about the many prominent West Grove families. I know enough to verify that at least most of her stories are true. Once I gave her a lift to the Metrorail but usually to the library. She says she just likes being outside and not confined.

    She makes me think of Boo Radley in “To Kill a Mockingbird.” And how families — and not always black or low income – used to take care of their children and adults like Ms. Dixon without relying on “the State.” I’m assuming that neighbors were ok with this, mostly.

    I think as a whole we’ve become less tolerant of having even to see them, maybe because we refuse to remember “There but for the grace of God go I.”

  5. This is a moving portrait, and I don’t doubt Ms. Dixon’s story is complicated.

    But there’s a bedrock principle at stake: equality before the law. It’s one of the few ideas that Americans across the political spectrum still agree on. We have no kings here. We believe that no matter who your father is or how rich you are, the law should apply to you the same as everyone else. And the principle has to cut both ways. It also can’t matter how poor you are, how sympathetic your story is, or how long you’ve lived in the neighborhood. One law for some and another for the rest of us is exactly what this country was founded to reject (and, incidentally, it’s one reason I left my home country and came to America).

    That’s why selective enforcement is so corrosive. When police apply a rule to some people and quietly waive it for others, nobody is protected by law anymore. We’re all subject to the whims of a community that might find my story moving but not someone else’s. The court of public opinion is no way to decide who the law applies to.

    If this ordinance is too harsh, the remedy is democratic: change it through the commission and the ballot box, as the two dissenting commissioners tried to do. What we can’t do is keep the law on the books and decide case by case who it applies to.

Leave a comment

Sponsors + Advertisement

Recent News