News

Benefits Boom: How Miami Quietly Turned Bonus Height Into Big Money


Miami Mayor Eileen Higgins (second from right) joins in during a groundbreaking last month for 1401 Brickell by Santander, a 50-story office tower in Miami’s financial district that paid the city $6.4 million to add 437,000 square feet above what base zoning limits would otherwise allow. (Photo courtesy of Banco Santander)
Miami District 2 Commissioner Damian Pardo secured $13 million from Miami’s Public Benefits Trust Fund last month for parks enhancements and affordable housing projects, but not before chronicling the quality-of-life impacts of the city’s pay-to-build program that generated the revenue. (Patrick Farrell for the Spotlight)

2 Comments

  1. Michael Langlois

    a few things leap out: the ignorance of some of our elected officials about this slush fund. the absurd discounts the city of miami is giving to developers per square foot. why? and, finally, something i actually agree with: if district 2, or any other district for that matter, is affected by this give away, then those districts should reasonably benefit from this fund. here’s the thing… you cannot continue to add density when there are no more roads to absorb this density and there is no mass transit that people seem willing to use. miami has already proven that their so-called urban planning is a complete and utter disaster and rather than learn from cities all over america and the world what happens when you allow development with little to no regard for livability or infrastructure or mass transit, you end up with traffic that has nowhere to go and pollution your residents have to tolerate and all for a few extra bucks. great idea.

  2. Anthony Parrish

    Legal vs Illegal Spot Zoning: One citizen’s view

    What is Illegal Spot Zoning?
    a.“Spot zoning occurs when a specific parcel… is reclassified with zoning regulations that differ significantly from surrounding properties…benefits a private owner… inconsistent with the established character of the larger, uniformly zoned area…(t)he planning commission then recommends to the city council…often challenged in court as an arbitrary or discriminatory…If the change deviates…without a clear public benefit, it may be deemed invalid.” LegalClarity Team
    b. Obvious case: Property Owner gives cash to one elected official one time for one property and convinces other officials to approve upzoning.

    What is Legal Spot Zoning?
    a. Upzonings for specific properties have been approved by the Commission for years based on changed circumstances. Example: Developer/Owner of a busy corner wants a 12 story building where only 5 story buildings are allowed because of neighboring 2 story residences. Solution: Upzone the front to high-rise while upzoning the rear to 3 story residential (a townhouse “liner” ) to provide the Code’s required transition, while also requiring a “Public Benefit” (example, a public park improvement).
    b. Transfers of Development Density (TDD) or Development Rights (TDR) means Density amendments (not always Transect category change) thereby upzoning multiple properties “that differ significantly from surrounding properties” that “ benefits a private owner.” In this case, the private owner is the entire high-rise development industry.

    The BIG Debate: Is the announced Public Benefit—providing “Affordable Housing”—primarily an excuse for building more luxury high-rise condominiums where abutting neighbors do not want them?

Leave a comment

Sponsors + Advertisement

Recent News