News, Politics

Miami Voters Embrace Change – Again



2 Comments

  1. Commissioner Pardo didn’t ask the City Attorney to “possibly” look into minimizing Live Local Act’s impact on NCDs through litigation. There is nothing “possibly” about RE.5. That’s exactly what RE.5 would do… it would “direct the City Attorney to pursue any and all legal avenues available to the City of Miami to challenge the Live Local Act…”. The problem with Commissioner Pardo’s approach is that there is almost no chance a Court would invalidate the Live Local Act. The Act passed the State Legislature 140-6. The Hillsborough County v. State of Florida case challenging the constitutionality of the Live Local Act is currently before the 2nd Judicial Circuit in Leon County. Florida State Attorney General James Uthmeier has issued a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint in the case. In my opinion, a far better approach for the City Commission would be for Commissioner Pardo to sponsor an Ordinance to analyze whether lobbying the State Legislature in the 2027 Regular Session to limit the application of the Live Local Act would be a more effective approach. Litigation challenging the constitutionality of the Live Local Act is a total waste of time and money… as Commissioner Pardo will see when the Hillsborough County case gets dismissed this year. None of our residents want the Live Local Act to negatively impact the Grove… but litigation is not the answer.

  2. I find it galling that he is taking credit for historic preservation.

Leave a comment

Sponsors + Advertisement

Recent News