With salaries and benefits consuming 77% of Miami’s budget, payroll systems track every dollar paid — including overtime and bonuses — but city officials declined to provide a full accounting of what employees actually earn.
The City of Miami can tell you what each of its 5,031 employees was scheduled to earn last year. What they won’t tell you is what they were actually paid.
The distinction matters.
For many city employees, base pay is just a starting point. Overtime, bonuses and other add-ons can significantly increase earnings, with some workers — news reports in cities across the U.S. show — doubling their base salary.
Such pay boosts may help explain why in the current fiscal year, salaries and benefits for City of Miami workers will account for roughly 77% of the city’s $1.8 billion operating budget, a number that has increased 57% in just five years.
Read more: Inside City Hall: Miami’s Pay Raise Machine
So how much, exactly, did each city employee actually take home last year?
The Spotlight asked, repeatedly.
The city won’t tell us.
After our December reporting showed that the number of city workers with base pay of at least $200,000 had more than doubled in two years, we filed a public records request seeking a full accounting of annual take-home pay.
Read more: Inside City Hall: Miami’s Growing $200K Club
Sorry, city officials told us, such records don’t exist. But they can be created, for a price: $193, to reimburse IT staff for two hours of their time.
We agreed to pay.
But days later, the offer was abruptly rescinded.
“Please be advised that the Office of the City Attorney has requested that we refrain from proceeding with this request,” Orlando Rodriguez, Assistant Director of the Office of Communications, wrote in an email, “noting that under state law the City is not required to create a new record in order to fulfill a public records request.”
So how can we obtain the data? we asked.
Rodriguiez refused to answer: “As previously stated, I must defer to the city attorney on this matter.”
We appealed the decision to City Attorney George Wysong, who promised “we will look into this.”
We never heard back. He’s not answering our emails.
We also appealed, repeatedly, to Miami’s chief administrator, City Manager James Reyes. He didn’t respond.
To understand what records do exist and which ones might shed light on total take-home pay by city workers, we asked for an interview with Human Resources Director Angela Roberts. She declined, after repeated requests, to speak with us.
So we submitted questions in writing to the Office of Communications. (City rules prevent its employees from responding directly to the media.)
In their response, officials confirmed that all employee pay — including base salary, overtime and other adjustments — is recorded at the “transaction level” and stored in systems that can be queried and exported.
They also confirmed that the city maintains a payroll database tracking all payments made to employees and has previously exported that data for audits and internal analysis.

Producing a comprehensive figure of “total compensation,” officials noted, would require combining payroll data with information from other departments, including pension contributions and benefit costs.
In its responses, the city acknowledged that it has, at times, produced reports showing total annual compensation by employee.
So, the records can be produced.
But the city won’t do it.
Hoping to bypass the city’s administrative staff – the very people whose employment data we’re seeking – we appealed to our elected officials. District 2 Commissioner Damian Pardo and his communications aide did not respond to our repeated requests.
Neither did Mayor Eileen Higgins, and her staff assistants, who arrived in office last December on a promise of bringing customer service and accountability to City Hall – as well as a “deep dive” into runaway city spending.
Multiple requests to Higgins and her office staff requesting help obtaining the salary data went unanswered.
In a city where overtime and other forms of additional pay play a major role in earnings — particularly in public safety departments — a full and complete picture of city employee compensation has broad policy implications: for setting the annual budget, for setting employee base salaries, for meeting pension obligations and for negotiations with the local municipal workers union.
Previous news reports, for instance, have detailed how City of Miami Fire-Rescue personnel have at times ranked among the city’s highest-paid employees once overtime is included, in some cases earning nearly as much in extra hours than in base salary.
In the city’s police department, heavy overtime has at times allowed employees to substantially increase take-home pay, driven by staffing shortages, scheduling practices and union rules.
Because pension benefits are typically tied to an employee’s highest-earning year, the ability to increase income through overtime can directly affect long-term retirement payouts, making total compensation, not base salary, the more meaningful measure of costs to taxpayers.
What the city’s current administration — and at least some of its elected officials — are offering for public consideration is only a partial view: base salaries, job titles and department assignments, along with aggregate personnel spending in the budget.
But in a system where overtime and supplemental pay can substantially increase earnings — and future pension obligations — what the city won’t show us remains a critical piece of its financial picture.





















More and more chiefs and fewer and fewer Indians. And the Great White Father is running out of free wampum to hand out. We may have to close the parks and schools and libraries soon.
I read this piece as I have so many similar past ones during the 30 years that I have lived in this wonderful city I dearly call My Ami, and each time I have felt, first, indignant, and second, impotent. This time I felt relieved. Not because what in Miami goes and goes on is correct. But because I finally accepted this is how it here is. This is Miami. It is what makes us Miami. In fact, the day this Phenomena ends, Miami will end. So, I propose you don’t write any more of these exposes. Just let it be. It will be. Because what your reporting does, is remind us of what it should be instead of what it is. Hence, there is conflict and pain and impotence – terrible results. It is futile to do as you. Let it go. Let it be. Let us be Happy with how it just is.
Another excellent article by Dave Villano and the Coconut Grove Spotlight.
It is deeply troubling that our City government would withhold public records and public information from the press and the public, especially after all the rhetoric about deep dives into City spending, fixing dysfunctionality and transparency in government.
I urge the Coconut Grove Spotlight to consider bringing legal action against the City of Miami for violations of the County’s and City’s Citizens’ Bill of Rights. Here are two pertinent sections:
“Public Records. All audits, reports, minutes, documents and other public records of
the County and the municipalities and their boards, agencies, departments and
authorities shall be open for inspection at reasonable times and places convenient to
the public.” And…
“Any public official, or employee who is found by the court to have willfully violated this section shall forthwith forfeit his or her office or employment.”
Any public-interest minded attorneys who’d like to volunteer to help clean up this city are urged to contact me:
[email protected]
Eternal vigilance is the price of democracy.
And then there is the “The Drop”…. The Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP).
As a city attorney for decades, I just wrote a novel entitled Where Nobody Knows Her Name. It’s all about corruption in local government and how easily it can proliferate in a city. It’s fiction, but all good fiction has truth in it…
Would we even care if we felt we were receiving good service for our tax dollars? Instead City Employees regularly ignore emails (with the exception of Javier) and don’t answer their phones. Why? Because apparently their job descriptions do not require them to be accountable or responsive to the people that are paying their salaries.