News, Community Voices

Opinion: Miami’s New Bike Plan Ignores its Biggest Challenge: E-Bikes


Miami’s updated Bicycle Master Plan does not address e-bikes or electric dirt bikes, despite growing concern among bicycling advocates about their speed, weight and use on city streets, such as this electric dirt bike on South Bayshore Drive. (David Villano for the Spotlight)

4 Comments

  1. “Miami’s updated Bicycle Master Plan does not address e-bikes or electric dirt bikes, despite growing concern among bicycling advocates about their speed, weight and use on city streets, such as this electric dirt bike on South Bayshore Drive.”

    I am not sure that the City of Miami can regulate e-bikes or electric dirt bikes on South Bayshore Drive. Section 316.20655(1) of the Florida Statutes does allow counties and cities to adopt an Ordinance governing the operation of electric bicycles on county or city streets. The State bills addressing electric bicycles in the current legislative session wouldn’t affect this provision.

    I would think that since South Bayshore Drive is a County road, perhaps only the County can adopt an Ordinance addressing e-bikes and electric dirt bikes on South Bayshore Drive. The Interlocal Agreement adopted in May, 2025 between Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami allows for specific traffic calming measures to be adopted by the City of Miami. Perhaps there needs to be an Interlocal Agreement between Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami that would allow the City of Miami to adopt an e-bike and electric dirt bike Ordinance on county roads that is more restrictive than the State law.

  2. I should add that my understanding from a Key Biscayne Commissioner is that Key Biscayne tried to regulate e-bikes on Crandon Boulevard, but was precluded from doing so because Crandon Boulevard is a County road.

  3. Florida House Bill 243 and Florida Senate Bill 382 have both unanimously passed 3 committees and are awaiting House and Senate Floor approval. The summary of these companion bills provide that:

    “…a person operating an electric bicycle on a shared pathway that is not located adjacent to a roadway, including a shared pathway located in a park or recreational area, shall yield to pedestrians and shall give an audible signal when overtaking and passing a pedestrian. Any person operating an electric bicycle on a sidewalk or any other area designated for pedestrian use may not operate the electric bicycle at a speed greater than 10 miles per hour if a pedestrian is within 50 feet of the electric bicycle.”

    It seems to me that the City of Miami could adopt an Ordinance providing more restrictive electric bicycle rules on the Main Highway and Kennedy Park bicycle/running/walking paths since these are under the jurisdiction of the City. Whether an electric bicycle could balance at a speed lower than 10 mph is an issue raised by a fellow neighbor. Another fellow neighbor indicated that studies show that a collision involving an electric bicycle traveling at 10 mph can cause traumatic injury. Public input on an updated Bicycle Master Plan, as Hank has suggested, will be most helpful in developing recommendations for City of Miami electric bicycle rules on shared pathways that are within its jurisdiction. Such comments will also be useful in developing recommendations regarding electric bicycles on County owned roads within the City of Miami.

  4. I want to begin by stating that I strongly support safe bicycle infrastructure where it is truly needed—particularly on causeways, bridges, and in areas where cyclists have no reasonable alternatives. I also support the goals of the City of Miami’s 2025 Updated Bicycle Plan, especially its emphasis on safety, connectivity, and reducing serious injuries.
    My concern is that the Plan appears to prioritize bicycle facilities on high-volume county collector and arterial roads. Miami already has a dense street grid with many parallel, lower-traffic routes that cyclists routinely and safely use for both east–west and north–south travel. This Plan emphasizes a low-stress bicycle network, yet concentrating bike lanes on congested commercial corridors seems inconsistent with that objective.
    Routing bicycle traffic onto busy arterials while diverting automobile traffic into residential streets raises serious concerns about safety, noise, and neighborhood livability. These trade-offs warrant careful, corridor-specific analysis of crash data, vehicle speeds, turning conflicts, loading zones, and emergency access. To date, public materials have relied largely on low-resolution maps, without clearly presenting the supporting data.
    I am also concerned that the Plan does not adequately address the growing presence of e-bikes and e-scooters. These devices travel faster and accelerate more quickly than traditional bicycles, which changes how bike lanes function—especially on narrow, curbside lanes shared with pedestrians, buses, and commercial activity. Without adequate width, separation, and design guidance, mixing conventional bikes, e-bikes, and scooters on major arterials may increase conflicts rather than improve safety.
    Easy and cost-effective alternatives deserve more attention.

Leave a comment

Sponsors + Advertisement

Recent News