News, Village Life

Fuller Street Makeover: Public Upgrade or Private Land Grab?


With the recent opening of nearby restaurants, including Chuggie’s, Fuller Street has seen a sudden increase in tables, visitors and trash. (Patrick Farrell for the Spotlight)
A jam-packed Fuller Street last January at the Gather in the Grove street party hosted by the Coconut Grove Business Improvement District. (Ellie Villano for the Spotlight)
Fuller Street in Center Grove during the second Coconut Grove Art Walk in May. (David Villano for the Spotlight)

7 Comments

  1. If the City had a good track record in stewardship of these projects, residents wouldn’t be worried. One only has to read the article about the Hangar to know what direction the Fuller Street and Kirk Munroe Park will take. The bright light many thought Damian would bring to helping residents of D2 has burnt out. In the same way Marc Sarnoff did a song and dance routine to convince residents of Regatta Park’s promise, Damian is now tap dancing to the Allen Morris tune. Frankly, at this point the Espinoza Family should come forward and become guardian angels. The park is right across the street from the elementary school and the park is a buffer between the outrageous growth arch of the grove and the residents of central Grove. My appeal is to the Espinoza family to leave a lasting and appropriate public good, and not the potential money maker for greedy politicians and developers. Show up at the Dec. 11th commission meeting, residents voices need to be loud and clear! Shame on you Damian and Javier!

  2. Why does Fuller St have to be developed at all? Just leave it alone. People can walk through now, they can sit and have a meal or a drink or just hang out. That’s the Grove!!!!

  3. I’m sorry, but our lawyers (for the City) suck. Whether this is by design or not, I have no idea. But no company or high-net-worth individual would put up with a legal team (including our Commissioners), who make such bad deals over and over again. The developers have teams of the highest paid lawyers on the planet. How are we as residents supposed to compete? And we’re on a giveaway spree to give away the only leverage we have, which are our last remaining open spaces!

    Developers can say they’re our partners all they want, but when they pony up paltry amounts compared to what we’re handing over, they’re acting more like leeches than anything else. They have no right to be upset that the public is reacting to the fact that they’re driving around in Bentleys we paid for, throwing parties in restaurants we subsidized and can’t afford. The bill is coming due and they need to act like real partners and first, stop trying to grab all our stuff, and secondly, give the frick back without whining. They know darned well none of these deals they’ve gotten have been fair.

  4. Our District 2 Commissioner Damian Pardo is quoted here as saying “Saving money and accelerating timelines goes hand-in-hand.” This has a similar saying well known to all developers: “Time is Money.” Our Commissioner should also remember other words to the wise: “Haste makes waste.”

    Those who seek a way to balance the interests of politicians and developers–and the majority of citizens who will be affected by decisions allowing public land to be even partially used for private purposes– often suggest a “Charette.”

    Having been involved with several of these “Gatherings of all the interested parties together to brainstorm for the best solution,” I suggest the following:
    1. Select a respected town planner to run the Charette.
    2. Announce a budget in 2026 dollars based on the sq. ft. cost of similar completed projects (e.g., Giralda Street in Coral Gables). There should be a low figure and a not-to-exceed high one to which all agree at the outset.
    3. Whichever plan is proposed and agreed upon is the one that gets built with minimal changes thereto.
    4. When the project gets delayed for any reason there is a funded/bonded escrow to pay for the overruns, and not the taxpayers.

    Without these agreed-upon guidelines, citizens usually end up massively disappointed and disillusioned, as happened with the “Grand Avenue Charette” over two decades ago. I don’t know if there was a Flagler Street Charette, but that disaster is still ongoing after 4 years.

  5. The community values will be ignored in the developers planning for Fuller Street, unless, we can provide a clear set of guidelines or plans for what the community wants. The plans do not have to be full blown architect drawings. But we need something to capture the community’s values.
    To get to that end I suggest running a sort of beauty contest to gather a range of “best” ideas. This actually happened in a less rigorous way already months ago on the CGN WhatsApp chat site. The exchanges and competition between different ideas led to some really good thoughts surfacing. That needs to be done again with a broader community involvement.
    I would suggest CGN run it as a two stage contest. First it invites ideas. Then it would select among all the entries no more than four ideas to be put to an open vote. That said, perhaps one of the four options should be default option — minimal changes or no changes at all to Fuller Street as it exists today. The other three selections would reflect the CGN committee’s beauty contest decision. I am strongly opposed to simply saying this developer is a good guy — let’s let him design the future Fuller Street. If we allow that, it will be our loss. Hopefully CGN will be more active in trying to ensure Fuller Street remains a community meeting area reflecting traditional Grove community values.

  6. Redesigning Fuller Street sounds like a solution in search of a problem.

  7. Unfortunately, there is a precedent in Coconut Grove for the handing over of our public park space to a private entity for the benefit of a privileged few. A few years ago, after an allegedly rigged charrette, the City Commission handed over the northwest corner of Peacock Park to Saint Stephen’s Episcopal Day School to create an outdoor athletic facility for the private school’s physical education program—displacing skateboarders, roller hockey teams and neighborhood camaraderie.

    Preceding Saint Stephen’s clergy sold-off the remaining land surrounding the school’s campus, and the growing private school had no place except for our adjacent public park to hold their P.E. classes. Now the general public can access the northwest corner of Peacock Park during limited hours only.

    The City often squanders our tax dollars and does not do its job to upgrade our public spaces, as they have been entrusted to do. That is not an excuse to export control of those spaces to private entities—it’s a call for accountability.

    In NYC, a citizens group, NYC Park Advocates sued NYC to limit future private takeovers of Damrosch Park, forcing the City to do its job, restore the park and make it more public-friendly. Unless the citizens of Coconut Grove unite and sue the City of Miami to stop them from selling-off control of our public spaces to private entities, it will keep happening.

    Melissa Meyer
    Coconut Grove

Leave a comment

Sponsors + Advertisement

Recent News